Abstract
This research aims to study the technical functions that Ibn Hisham Al-Ansari was aiming for by citing the analogue witness after the original witness. It was noted in his book (Mughni al-Labib) and other books of the previous grammarians that they cite an original witness to prove the rule, then they add to it with similar evidence expressed by (the analogy) and (the proverb). By the analogous witness, they mean the one that reinforces the rule that reinforces the original witness. It is similar to the original witness in a certain idea or aspect, but it differs from it in another part. By the original rulings, it means: the universal laws, the rule, and the evidence, and what is meant here is the meaning of the universal rules in the manner under which many issues fall under partial.
The research is divided into two sections. The first sections deal with the Qur’anic analogous witness in the elimination and similarity phenomena. The second section deals with the poetic analogue witness to the satiation, grammatical puzzles, and poetic necessity phenomena. The first section is divided into two topics, one of which is: the phenomenon of deletion and the phenomenon of similarity. The second section is divided into three topics: the first: the phenomenon of satisfaction, the second: grammatical puzzles, and the third: poetic necessity. Then, the results of the research, the index of sources and references are presented
